I have a Noctura NH-U14S with the second fan installed. Using Ryzen Master I can see it report CPU in the 35040C range under mild idle yet HWInfo shows upper 40sC at same time At the same time HWInfo shows Die Average and both CCD show be about what Ryzen Master is. Just now hile folding with 6 of 8 cpu cores my 1080 and 960 and running lots of other programs the HWMonitor TMPIN2 reading was around 38 to 40 C while the PCH temperature reported by HWInfo was 485 C. CPUID HWMonitor - Explanation of specific sections. I get a lot of inconsistencies with HWmonitor. I just finished building a SB 2500K system with the following specs. This will start HWiNFO minimized and without the sensor summary.
So I been using CPUID HWMonitor for quite a long time and now I decided to switch to HWInfo64 and boy this software give me more details about my PC voltages and temperatures than CPUID HWMonitor. Aida64 doesnt give as much information as I would like but I keep it to compare with HWinfo64. RyzenMaster uses a AMD proprietary method to report CPU temp undisclosed to public HWiNFO developersauthors included. HWiNFO is the superior monitoring tool since it shows everything and labels them according to the sensor. The program handles the most common sensor chips like ITE. While overclocking my 1800x I noticed that HWmonitor and CPU-Z show me different VCORE readings then HWINFO. CPUID HWMonitor CPU Temps.ĬPUID HWMonitor incorrect readings. Reading from motherboard and from CPU itself will be different. By TigerClaw Apin Programs Apps and Websites.ĪSUS STRIX X370-F 1800x 32gb 2x16 3200CL14. I understand HWINFO is highly recommended. Is pretty stable where as the two other softwares keeps fluctating all of the time jumping from 40 to 49 back down to 44 then to 50 ect. HWMonitor is a hardware monitoring program that reads PC systems main health sensors. Thats why there is discrepancies between readings. In addition it can read modern CPUs on-die core thermal sensors as well has hard drives. RyzenMaster temp report has no direct equivalent on any other monitoring tool.
Is Package Node The Correct Temperature And Anyone Know How To Get Temperatures For All Cores Overclocking They may be showing values from different sensors.Ĭpuid hwmonitor vs hwinfo. See my screenshot below.I would put HWMonitor in front as more accurate. Could it be that the CPU temp is indeed correct and it is the core temps that are off? I have been assuming all along that the core temperatures were correct and the "CPU" temp was screwed up. In fact it made sense if the CPU temp was supposed to be Tcase since the cores were then about 7C hotter than the case. What I discovered was that it displayed the "CPU" temperature the same as BIOS/Speedfan/ASUSProbe but it had a whole new take on the Core temperatures. I noticed that they (CPUID) had a new tool called CPUID Hardware Monitor so I thought I would give it a whirl. I have always trusted CPUZ as an excellent tool to display my CPU and memory information. So I just assumed that the CPU temperature was messed up. Well my "CPU" temperature as reported in my BIOS, Speedfan, and ASUS Probe has always been about 8C hotter than my cores which is ridiculous since nothing should be hotter than the silicon itself. ASUS Probe doesn't report core temperatures. Since Speedfan, Coretemp, and RealTemp all seemed to agree on precisely the same core temperatures I assumed everything was rosey. For some time I have been using Speedfan, Coretemp, RealTemp, and ASUS Probe to measure my CPU temperatures.